Daniel Munoz-De La Nava vs Federico Gaio Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W L W L
Form
W W W L W W L W W LHead-To-Head: Nava 3 - 1 Gaio
They have played 12 sets in total, with Nava winning 7 and Gaio winning 5. The last match between Nava and Gaio was at the Padova Challenger, 24-07-2018, First, Clay with Federico Gaio getting the victory 6-7(0) 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Munoz-De La Nava | 3 |
| Federico Gaio | 1 |
| Nava | Stats | Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 742 |
| 68 | Highest Rank | 124 |
| 43 | Age | 33 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 13 |
| 57% (521-389) | Career Total W/L | 55% (526-439) |
| $282,573 | Career Prize Money | $392,005 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(0) 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-1 1-6 7-6(5) |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Federico Gaio
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Federico Gaio
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| 6-2 5-7 6-2 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Federico Gaio
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 62 | Games Won | 58 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 33 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 2:12:30 | Average Match Time | 2:12:30 |
| 60% (224/372) | 1st Serve % | 61% (216/353) |
| 73% (163/224) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (151/216) |
| 49% (73/148) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (67/137) |
| 48% (14/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (14/34) |
| 38% (135/353) | Return Points Win % | 37% (136/372) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 75% (3/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava vs Federico Gaio Best Odds For The Match
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jan Choinski
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Sandro Ehrat
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Inigo Cervantes
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Nys
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Federico Gaio
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gabriele Bosio
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
88%
(
53 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gianluca Carlini
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Gaio
44%
(
40 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Filippo Romano
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alessandro Dragoni
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nava vs Gaio?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nava Vs Gaio is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (521/389) | Win/Loss | 55% (526/439) |
| 56% (1196/927) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1205/1068) |
| 53% (10683/9535) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11068/10593) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1448 | Aces Total | 3004 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1385 | Total Double Faults | 2390 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:9:27 |
| 114.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.01 |
| 57% (18965/33123) | 1st Serve % | 58% (27135/47153) |
| 70% (13232/18965) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (19324/27135) |
| 51% (7210/14158) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10139/20018) |
| 42% (1469/3496) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1750/4458) |
| 41% (13739/33849) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18415/48497) |
| 58% (511/884) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (515/949) |
| 15% (2/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (6/9) |
| 49% (137/279) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (141/309) |
| 48% (145/301) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (183/340) |
| 83% (534/442) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (511/435) |
| 17% (534/91) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (511/76) |
| 21% (376/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (454/90) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
